Afghan Eye
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Analysis
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Youtube
  • Support Us
  • Peoples
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
Afghan Eye
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Analysis
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Youtube
  • Support Us
  • Peoples
No Result
View All Result
Afghan Eye
No Result
View All Result
Home Afghanistan Afghan History

Decentralisation: the final stand of Afghan warlords

April 19, 2020
in Afghan History, Analysis, News
0 0
0

Source: Wikimedia

0
SHARES
1.9k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In Afghanistan, political goalposts change frequently. This was seen recently in the New York Times op-ed of Ahmad Massoud. As son of late warlord Ahmad Shah Massoud, he argues persuasively for decentralisation as a way forward for the country in the backdrop of talks with the Taliban. A certain degree of historical revisionism is inevitable in every state in order to craft the grand tale of the nation’s birth. As evidenced by this op-ed though, historical revisionism is exceptionally strong in Afghanistan.

Massoud firstly stipulates that the 2004 Afghan constitution, modelled on the royal constitution of 1964 ‘may have assuaged the former monarchy’s beneficiaries, but it completely ignored the fundamental political transformation of the country through the upheavals of the past four decades’. This contention of Massoud’s does not reflect accurately what led to and resulted from the 2004 constitutional arrangement, and ignores realities that would serve as an eyesore for the cause he has now picked up.

Actually, the allies of Massoud’s father in the Northern Alliance were major stakeholders in and beneficiaries of creating the new order. A disproportionate number of ministers and high ranking officials were now from Massoud’s native Panjshir. These included men like his uncle Vice President Ahmad Zia Massoud. Field Marshal Muhammad Qasim Fahim served as Minister of Defense, in Afghanistan’s Meshranu Jirga (upper house of Parliament) and later as Vice President. Yunus Qanuni served as Speaker of the Wolasi Jirga (lower house of parliament).

Massoud writes that ‘in a multiethnic society, the centralized unitary-presidential system has fanned the flames of internal conflict. The problem is exacerbated when a particular person or group holding the presidency resorts to divisive and ethnocentric policies’ and that ‘patronage of a particular group by the head of state has created a major cleavage’. Massoud isn’t entirely wrong here. In Afghanistan, politicians exploiting ethnicity for their own ends is routine.

This is not unique to the current administration, however. A case in point is that of Amrullah Saleh, another Panjsheri and VP of Ashraf Ghani. Formally head of NDS, Saleh opposed ex President Karzai’s overtures to the Taliban due to ethnic animosity. Detailed in Steve Coll’s book Directorate S, Saleh was apprehensive about peace with the Taliban, which he could only conceive through fears this would lead to a perceived Pashtun domination.

Reminder: men like @AmrullahSaleh2 have been opposed to a peaceful settlement in Afghanistan for over a decade, citing a variety of different reasons.

As head of the NDS, Saleh led a torture network of dungeons.

Undoubtedly, this was a major recruiting call for the Taliban. pic.twitter.com/yPIkuLjlOn

— AW Kakar (@awsanzar) April 12, 2020

Massoud states that his father ‘Ahmad Shah Massoud, the national hero of Afghanistan, was able to unite the ethnic groups under one banner. He brought together important Pashtun, Tajik, Uzbek and Hazara leaders.’ Firstly, it must be stated that the label of ‘national hero’ was imposed posthumously and forcefully by Massoud Snr’s allies. Massoud Snr was exonerated in the popular imagination for his partaking in a civil war with Hekmatyar, Sayyaf, Mazari and Dostum that wrought a level of destruction on Kabul the city is yet to recover from. The claims of him being a ‘national hero’, when placed under scrutiny, fail to hold water.

Neither was Massoud Snr above politicising ethnicity. He partook in tit for tat massacres of Hazaras in Kabul. There are also his inconveniently recorded clips within which he insults Pashtuns. In the below clip, Massoud Snr states ‘they [Pashtuns] instituted a dynastic, tribal form of government in Afghanistan’ whilst ‘these people [Pashtuns] 200-300 years ago had no culture or civilisation, and we see that they have kept these traits until now’.

pic.twitter.com/tNpNRw4aWx

— AW Kakar (@awsanzar) April 18, 2020

Most disconcerting, though, is not the article; it was the tweet written captioning his article.

As Afghanistan prepares to begin peace negotiations amid a political crisis, I propose that decentralization of power and wealth is imperative to a lasting peace which can end this 200-year-old conflict @nytopinion https://t.co/qgSqyNgIax

— Ahmad Massoud (@AhmadMassoudoff) April 14, 2020

It is true that in the stated time frame, Afghanistan has seen internecine wars of succession, two invasions by British India, a Soviet invasion and occupation and the ongoing US occupation. If, though, he is referring to ‘this’ conflict, this begs the question: which conflict?

Simply put, none of the conflicts in Afghanistan have lasted for two centuries. Furthermore, Afghanistan was a hereditary Emirate when twice invaded by the British, a secular republic when invaded by the Soviets and a Taliban emirate when invaded by the Americans and is now an Islamic Republic. Government style then is the variable, not the constant.

Is Massoud thus implying that the advent of the Afghan state itself in the 19th century was an unwelcome development? Doubtless is the reality that this polity’s establishment accompanied the predominance of Pashtun families at the highest echelons of the establishment. This was predictably so: the state was monarchical, and members of a family belong to the same ethnicity. As demonstrated, this was to the chagrin of many non-Pashtuns, including Massoud Snr. Is Massoud using a unique and ethnically deterministic narrative of history to recast the last two centuries in a radically different light?

The supposedly totalitarian control Kabul commands in the current constitution is belied by reality: Kabul is impotent to exercise its writ over local strongmen. Examples are the embarrassing fiascos with Nizamuddin Qaisary and Atta Muhammad Noor. Kabul is powerless to pursue charges against its own Vice President, instead having him sent to shortlived exile. What is understood need not be written. As described by Ajmal Burhanzoi ‘present political instability is not produced by the mere existence of a nominal centralized government; instead, it is the result of de facto decentralized governance practices’. The same factions who crippled state building cannot be kingmakers in a new settlement.

Massoud complains that talks of decentralisation were absent in the peace deal with the Taliban. Yet he seems to have missed precisely the point: the peace deal was signed between the US and the Taliban, and it detailed complete American non-interference in Afghan affairs. One would assume that by now, Massoud would have learnt foreign interference in domestic Afghan affairs does not end well. Even if this were for his own benefit. Apparently not.

Afghanistan’s problems are more rudimentary than government type. Foremost amongst these is the entrenchment of political dynasties, a product of which is Massoud himself. After all, despite the plethora of posts held by Massoud Snr’s Panjshiri allies over the last 18 years, Panjshir is still one of the poorest provinces in the country. No amount of (de)centralisation when staffed by the same people can yield dividends.

Tags: Afghan PoliticsAfghanistan
Previous Post

COVID-19 casts menacing shadow over Afghan peace process

Next Post

Afghan Women’s Rights Advocates weigh in on Intra-Afghan Negotiations

Related Posts

The First Half of 2023- The Afghanistan Report
Afghan Politics

The First Half of 2023- The Afghanistan Report

July 3, 2023
Haqqani. Right: an Afghan student at Kabul University.
Afghan History

Afghanistan’s Century of Politicised Education

December 21, 2022
News

Mistaken Identities

October 18, 2022
President Najib giving decoration to a Soviet serviceman. Picture taken from Wikimedia.
Afghan History

Thirty Years Since April 1992 – Fragmentation Upon Success

June 3, 2022
Analysis

Afghanistan Quarterly – Newsletter

June 1, 2022
Girls at school in Gereshk, Helmand province, 2010. Picture taken from Wikimedia.
afghan women

The Consequences of Closing Girls’ Schools

March 30, 2022
Next Post

Afghan Women's Rights Advocates weigh in on Intra-Afghan Negotiations

STAY CONNECTED

  • 99 Subscribers
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
How the Taliban Won? With Justice, Says One Expert

How the Taliban Won? With Justice, Says One Expert

May 24, 2023

The Untold History of Ahmad Shah Massoud

September 7, 2020
The First Half of 2023- The Afghanistan Report

The First Half of 2023- The Afghanistan Report

July 3, 2023
Haqqani. Right: an Afghan student at Kabul University.

Afghanistan’s Century of Politicised Education

December 21, 2022

The Durand Line: Beyond Nationalist Fables

19

Niazi No More: The Life and Legacy of a Taliban Mutineer

15

Fighting Words: Conflict and Mediation with the Loya Paktia Taliban

5
Haqqani. Right: an Afghan student at Kabul University.

Afghanistan’s Century of Politicised Education

2
The First Half of 2023- The Afghanistan Report

The First Half of 2023- The Afghanistan Report

July 3, 2023
How the Taliban Won? With Justice, Says One Expert

How the Taliban Won? With Justice, Says One Expert

May 24, 2023
The Afghan Brief – Episode 4

Episode 34 | Sepi Azarbaijani-Moghaddam: The Taliban banned from women working for the UN

April 16, 2023
Podcasts

Episode 33 | Abdul Hai Qanit | The Taliban's diplomatic breakthroughs

April 3, 2023

Recent News

The First Half of 2023- The Afghanistan Report

The First Half of 2023- The Afghanistan Report

July 3, 2023
How the Taliban Won? With Justice, Says One Expert

How the Taliban Won? With Justice, Says One Expert

May 24, 2023
The Afghan Brief – Episode 4

Episode 34 | Sepi Azarbaijani-Moghaddam: The Taliban banned from women working for the UN

April 16, 2023
Podcasts

Episode 33 | Abdul Hai Qanit | The Taliban's diplomatic breakthroughs

April 3, 2023
Afghan Eye

We are The Afghan Eye. We are an independently operated media platform dedicated to critiquing and providing a counter narrative to what mainstream media portrays of Afghanistan.

Follow Us

Browse by Category

  • Afghan History
  • Afghan Politics
  • afghan women
  • Afghanistan
  • Analysis
  • Culture
  • Explainers
  • Interview
  • News
  • Newsletter
  • Opinion
  • Photography
  • Podcasts
  • Review
  • Taliban

Recent News

The First Half of 2023- The Afghanistan Report

The First Half of 2023- The Afghanistan Report

July 3, 2023
How the Taliban Won? With Justice, Says One Expert

How the Taliban Won? With Justice, Says One Expert

May 24, 2023

© 2023 Afghan Eye - All Rights Reserved | Powered By TechChef Inc.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Analysis
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Youtube
  • Support Us
  • Peoples
  • Login
  • Sign Up

© 2023 Afghan Eye - All Rights Reserved | Powered By TechChef Inc.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}