Afghan Eye
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Analysis
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Youtube
  • Support Us
  • Peoples
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
Afghan Eye
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Analysis
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Youtube
  • Support Us
  • Peoples
No Result
View All Result
Afghan Eye
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Why the Doha Deal is still the best formula for lasting peace in Afghanistan

February 28, 2021
in Opinion
0 0
0

Mullah Bradar and Zalmay Khalilzad sign the US-Talib peace deal. Source: nunn.Asia

0
SHARES
609
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

A year after the signing of the Doha Deal, it is still the best solution for ending Afghanistan’s four decade long turmoil. 

In 1986, when it became abundantly clear that Soviet forces would withdraw from Afghanistan, having occupied it since 1979, the communist regime pursued a policy of National Reconciliation. The intention was to reach a peaceful resolution with the armed opposition and create a new government where all political factions could participate in democratic elections. However, the failure of the regime in Kabul and its armed opposition to capitalise on that unique opportunity after the departure of Soviet troops resulted in the brutal civil war of the 1990’s.

Much has been said about the role of neighbouring countries in the creation of internal turmoil in Afghanistan. The problem with this: blaming neighbours entirely, is that it takes away agency from Afghans. Without the presence of foreign forces, Afghan political factions do have the autonomy to act rationally and serve their own interests.

Which brings us to the US-Taliban Peace Agreement that was signed on 29th February 2020. The historic significance of the agreement between the Taliban and the United States can only be grasped when it is seen within the context of Afghanistan’s recent history. For two decades the United States and its allies occupied Afghanistan and supported a collection of disparate Afghan factions, while others were fought against and persecuted.

Today, Afghanistan is more divided than ever before. Since 2001, tensions based on ethnic, linguistic, religious and regional differences have engulfed politics, media, education and even the civil service. Violence is reportedly at an all time high. Every year Afghanistan is in the top five of the most corrupt nations in the world and inequality is increasing at a rapid pace. Nobody can claim that today’s Afghanistan is by any measure a successful attempt at nation building.

Meanwhile several surveys have shown that the vast majority of Americans want to bring their troops home. The United States and other members of NATO are facing major economic and political challenges on their home front. Therefore, continuation of occupation and idealist attempts to convert Afghanistan in a Western style liberal democracy no longer enjoy popular support in Western countries.

Prior to the signing ceremony of the Doha Deal, the US Special Representative for Afghan Peace, Zalmay Khalilzad travelled continuously to Afghanistan and its neighbouring countries. The purpose of his travels was to reach a consensus with all the actors involved before a deal could be signed with the Taliban. When the Doha Deal was finally signed, it was approved by the United Nations Security Council, with all neighbouring countries expressing their general support, with Iran’s attitude yet ambiguous.

The reason behind the initial success of the Doha Deal was its very simple formula: all foreign forces would leave Afghanistan, the Taliban would agree to deny safe havens for groups that may pose a threat to other nations and intra-Afghan negotiations would start, aiming to create lasting peace in Afghanistan. That formula can still yield results as no other major component in the raging war has changed.

Without the military presence of the United States and other NATO members in Afghanistan, what’s left behind are a collective of Afghan political factions riveted by their own internal differences against another Afghan political faction: the Taliban. Most of these factions were in some capacity active in Afghanistan after the fall of the communist regime in 1992. However, back then, they failed to reach a common ground and make peace, instead inflicting massive destruction on the country in a brutal civil war.

Therefore, the US-Taliban Peace Agreement and the subsequent intra-Afghan negotiations present a second attempt for the same factions to reach a peaceful resolution to the conflict. The departure of foreign forces leaves Afghan factions to settle their differences with one another on an equal playing field, without the unfair advantage of one faction being overwhelmingly more powerful than others due to the presence of allied foreign forces.

Lastly, the regional consensus that has been reached is a clear indication that the circumstances are now ideal for Afghans to negotiate with one another, instead of relying on neighbouring countries for support in war against fellow Afghans.

While many obvious attempts have been made in the last twelve months to sabotage the Doha Deal, it is evident that the intention behind them was to ensure that foreign forces stay behind and continue supporting one faction against another. This provides ample reason for a timely withdrawal of all foreign forces in accordance to the Doha Deal. Foreign forces should not, and as the last two decades clearly demonstrated, could not eliminate other Afghan factions, even if at the behest of their local clients.

Ultimately, Afghans need to rely on their own abilities to negotiate and reach a consensus with their compatriots without dragging outsiders along with them; Afghanistan is the home of all Afghans despite all their internal differences and conflicts.

Tags: afghan peace processafghan peace talksAfghan Politicsafghan warAfghanistandoha dealIntra-Afghan dialogueintra-afghan negotiationsintra-afghan talksTalibanus-taliban peace agreementwar on terrorzalmay khalilzad
Previous Post

A critical review of the Afghanistan Study Group’s report | The Afghan Eye Podcast episode 21

Next Post

The Durand Line: Beyond Nationalist Fables

Related Posts

News

Mistaken Identities

October 18, 2022
Analysis

Afghanistan Quarterly – Newsletter

June 1, 2022
Girls at school in Gereshk, Helmand province, 2010. Picture taken from Wikimedia.
afghan women

The Consequences of Closing Girls’ Schools

March 30, 2022
MatiasEnElMundo / Getty Images
News

What Plato´s “Allegory of the Cave” could teach us about Afghan Twitter?

February 7, 2022
Analysis

Afghanistan Monthly – January

February 1, 2022
News

The World Must Not Punish Afghans

October 5, 2021
Next Post

The Durand Line: Beyond Nationalist Fables

STAY CONNECTED

  • 99 Subscribers
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
How the Taliban Won? With Justice, Says One Expert

How the Taliban Won? With Justice, Says One Expert

May 24, 2023

The Untold History of Ahmad Shah Massoud

September 7, 2020
The First Half of 2023- The Afghanistan Report

The First Half of 2023- The Afghanistan Report

July 3, 2023
Haqqani. Right: an Afghan student at Kabul University.

Afghanistan’s Century of Politicised Education

December 21, 2022

The Durand Line: Beyond Nationalist Fables

19

Niazi No More: The Life and Legacy of a Taliban Mutineer

15

Fighting Words: Conflict and Mediation with the Loya Paktia Taliban

5
Haqqani. Right: an Afghan student at Kabul University.

Afghanistan’s Century of Politicised Education

2
The First Half of 2023- The Afghanistan Report

The First Half of 2023- The Afghanistan Report

July 3, 2023
How the Taliban Won? With Justice, Says One Expert

How the Taliban Won? With Justice, Says One Expert

May 24, 2023
The Afghan Brief – Episode 4

Episode 34 | Sepi Azarbaijani-Moghaddam: The Taliban banned from women working for the UN

April 16, 2023
Podcasts

Episode 33 | Abdul Hai Qanit | The Taliban's diplomatic breakthroughs

April 3, 2023

Recent News

The First Half of 2023- The Afghanistan Report

The First Half of 2023- The Afghanistan Report

July 3, 2023
How the Taliban Won? With Justice, Says One Expert

How the Taliban Won? With Justice, Says One Expert

May 24, 2023
The Afghan Brief – Episode 4

Episode 34 | Sepi Azarbaijani-Moghaddam: The Taliban banned from women working for the UN

April 16, 2023
Podcasts

Episode 33 | Abdul Hai Qanit | The Taliban's diplomatic breakthroughs

April 3, 2023
Afghan Eye

We are The Afghan Eye. We are an independently operated media platform dedicated to critiquing and providing a counter narrative to what mainstream media portrays of Afghanistan.

Follow Us

Browse by Category

  • Afghan History
  • Afghan Politics
  • afghan women
  • Afghanistan
  • Analysis
  • Culture
  • Explainers
  • Interview
  • News
  • Newsletter
  • Opinion
  • Photography
  • Podcasts
  • Review
  • Taliban

Recent News

The First Half of 2023- The Afghanistan Report

The First Half of 2023- The Afghanistan Report

July 3, 2023
How the Taliban Won? With Justice, Says One Expert

How the Taliban Won? With Justice, Says One Expert

May 24, 2023

© 2023 Afghan Eye - All Rights Reserved | Powered By TechChef Inc.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Analysis
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Youtube
  • Support Us
  • Peoples
  • Login
  • Sign Up

© 2023 Afghan Eye - All Rights Reserved | Powered By TechChef Inc.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}